Legal Opinion
People v. Dunlap
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1993No. F018550PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
In the published portion of this opinion we hold that the trial court properly admitted a California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) computer printout of appellant’s criminal information history (rap sheet) under the official records exception to the hearsay rule (Evid. Code, § 1280) as evidence that appellant served two prior prison terms for which his sentence in this action was enhanced. In doing so we rely on judicial notice of pertinent statutes and the presumption that official duty was regularly performed (Evid. Code, § 664).
In the unpublished…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Preis v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Gananian v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bhatt v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Department of California Highway Patrol v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.