Legal Opinion
C.I.T. Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Young
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 8, 1989No. 87-CV-31; CA A46894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Third-party plaintiffs (Young) appeal from the portion of a judgment awarding third-party defendant Hessel defense expenses incurred in Young v. Hessel Tractor & Equipment Co. 99 Or App 262, 782 P2d 164 (1989). Hessel also sought attorney fees incurred in this action after both parties had stipulated to dismissal of Young’s third-party complaint. The trial court awarded Hessel $46,109.45 for defense expenses incurred in the other case as well as $6,698.25 in attorney fees incurred in this action. The award of fees incurred in this action is not challenged.
Hessel and Young, as the seller and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Smith Radio Communications, Inc. v. Challenger Equipment, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Williams v. LeathamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Young v. Hessel Tractor & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Title Insurance Co. v. Marderosian (In Re Marderosian)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
- Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Shockey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Young v. Hessel Tractor & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989