Legal Opinion

Young v. Hessel Tractor & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1989No. CV 86-727; CA A46574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an action by a purchaser of logging equipment for breach of the warranty of merchantability and to revoke his acceptance of the equipment. The trial court refused to submit to the jury one of plaintiffs theories concerning revocation of acceptance. The jury returned a verdict against plaintiff on the warranty claim. Plaintiffs several assignments of error challenge the trial court’s ruling withdrawing the revocation of acceptance theory from the jury.

In March, 1985, plaintiff contracted to purchase from defendant a feller-buncher to shear trees in plaintiffs logging business. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Crume v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Clark v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Roberts v. Morgensen MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. WatersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. C.I.T. Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Tokyo Ohka Kogyo America, Inc. v. Huntsman Propylene Oxide LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API