Legal Opinion

Smith Radio Communications, Inc. v. Challenger Equipment, Ltd.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1974PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

This is an action for common law indemnity brought by a retailer, Smith Radio Communications, Inc., to recover sums paid to defend an action and pay a judgment for personal injuries caused by a defective electronic signaling device which plaintiff purchased from defendant and sold to the employer of the injured workman. The court tried the action without a jury and found for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The parties filed in this court an agreed narrative statement which includes the following facts.

Defendant Challenger Equipment, Ltd., is a Canadian corporation engaged in designing,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. KENNEDY v. ColtOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. OS Stapley Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Chambers Gasket & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Kerns v. EngelkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Hanover Ltd. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API