Legal Opinion

State v. Abrams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1976No. 7510SC808PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

There is no merit in defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Upon a motion for nonsuit, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, and nonsuit should be denied where there is sufficient evidence, direct, circumstantial, or both, from which the jury could find that the offense charged has been committed and that defendant committed it. State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509, 160 S.E. 2d 469 (1968). Defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. RookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Letchworth v. GayDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. MurchinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API