Legal Opinion

State v. Rook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1975No. 7510SC76PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The bill of indictment charges a violation of G.S. 20-106. A defendant charged with the violation of a statute or ordinance may challenge the constitutionality -of such statute or ordinance by a motion to quash the warrant or indictment. State v. Atlas, 283 N.C. 165, 195 S.E. 2d 496 (1973).

G.S. 20-106 reads: “Any person who, with intent to procure or pass title to a vehicle which he knows or has reason to believe has been stolen or unlawfully taken, receives or transfers possession of the same from or to another, or who has in his possession any vehicle which he knows or has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. AtlasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. MurchinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API