Legal Opinion

Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc. v. Town of Framingham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHonan, J.

This is a bill in equity brought by a subcontractor to reach, in payment for labor supplied and materials furnished, the security in the form of a bond furnished by the general contractors at the time they entered into a written contract with the town of Framingham for the construction of a tunnel or outlet for the flow of water from Beaver Dam Brook and also for the repair of an existing sluiceway or tunnel draining the said brook under a nearby roadway. The New York Central Railroad Company was permitted to file an intervening petition. A final decree establishing the indebtedness of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Turner v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Ross & Roberts, Inc. v. SimonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Willett v. WillettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. D & P Equipment Corp. v. Harvey Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. N-Tek Construction Services, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Fiske's Garden Center, Inc. v. Sydney Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API