Legal Opinion
Berman v. Coakley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 13, 1926PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a suit in equity by a client against one who formerly was his attorney for an accounting as to *161sums of money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as his attorney because, as alleged, the latter conspired with one Corcoran to cheat and defraud the plaintiff by suppressing or feigning to suppress a charge made, as a part of the conspiracy, against the plaintiff to the district attorney by a husband to the effect that the plaintiff as proprietor of a hotel had suffered the wife of the complaining husband to resort to the plaintiff’s hotel for purposes of unlawful sexual intercourse.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Hill v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Cohen v. NagleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Broomfield v. KosowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.