Legal Opinion

Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Casualty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 15, 1953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for labor and materials. The auditor, to whom the case was referred, found these facts. On June 1, 1950, the defendant Frankini Construction Co. Inc., hereinafter called Frankini, entered into a contract with the Waltham Housing Authority for the construction of a State aided housing project in Waltham. Pursuant to the terms of the contract Frankini, as principal, and the defendant Peerless Casualty Company, as surety, executed and delivered to the Waltham Housing Authority a “performance and payment bond.” Subsequently the plaintiff entered into a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Metropolitan Pipe & Supply Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A. Belanger & Sons, Inc. v. Joseph M. Concannon Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. Superior Glass Co. v. First Bristol County National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. United States v. Harrison And Grimshaw Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Waite Hardware Co. v. Ardini & Pfau, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Gordon v. Robinson Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API