Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Ruegg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1998No. 64881-6PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Petitioner Stacy R. Bennett, personal representative in a decedent estate, seeks review of a Court of Appeals per curiam decision which reversed a judgment of the King County Superior Court awarding attorneys’ fees to the estate of Mary Margaret Kerr on behalf of Petitioner, personal representative of the estate, who successfully resisted her removal in a probate proceeding. We granted review. We reverse.

QUESTION PRESENTED

The question presented in this case is whether, under the general fee provision of the Probate Code, RCW 11.96.140,1 courts may award discretionary attorneys’ fees in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re YimWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Estate of KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. O.S.T. v. Regence BlueShieldWashington Supreme Court · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API