Bennett v. Ruegg
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Petitioner Stacy R. Bennett, personal representative in a decedent estate, seeks review of a Court of Appeals per curiam decision which reversed a judgment of the King County Superior Court awarding attorneys’ fees to the estate of Mary Margaret Kerr on behalf of Petitioner, personal representative of the estate, who successfully resisted her removal in a probate proceeding. We granted review. We reverse.
QUESTION PRESENTED
The question presented in this case is whether, under the general fee provision of the Probate Code, RCW 11.96.140,1 courts may award discretionary attorneys’ fees in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re YimWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Estate of KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- O.S.T. v. Regence BlueShieldWashington Supreme Court · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.