Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1922No. Civ. No. 4232PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Southern Pacific Company, from a judgment against it for $5,000 in an action by plaintiff to recover damages because of the death of her minor child, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of said defendant.

A motion for nonsuit was granted as to the other defendant in the action, evidently upon the principle that the cause of action did not survive the death of Louis Stout.

The appellant urges, first, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that there is no allegation that the plaintiff’s husband is dead…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In re the Estate of RayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
  5. Lawrence v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re the Estate of McArthorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gregoriev v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API