Legal Opinion

Yelle v. Kramer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1974No. 42959PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foreword

Weaver, C.J.*

When each member of the Washington State Supreme Court announced his disqualification because of a personal interest in the decision to be made in this case, it was submitted to a pro tempore Supreme Court composed of two retired Supreme Court justices and seven retired Superior Court judges.

In 1962, amendment 38 was added to article 4 of our state constitution. It provides:

When necessary for the prompt and orderly administration of justice a majority of the Supreme Court is *466empowered to authorize judges or retired judges of courts of record of this state, to perform,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Washington State Labor Council v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hallin v. TrentWashington Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API