Legal Opinion

Bruner v. McCarthy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943No. 6566PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

E. E. Bruner, plaintiff and respondent, who was employed as a hostler’s helper on the railroad of the defendants, was injured in the course of his employment. He commenced this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51, to recover damages from his employers for these injuries. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

All assignments of error, except one relating to the admission in evidence of Exhibit G, relate to various instructions given to the jury. By several of the assignments the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Owens v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Robinson v. EbertWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pulos v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Balano v. NafzigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pauly v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Moore v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lemmon v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Emery v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API