Legal Opinion
Cormier v. Grant
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 5, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1. The defendants are not without some basis in claiming that the trial judge erred in admitting a scale diagram of the accident intersection without verifying “the accuracy of the representation.” McKarren v. Boston & No. St. Ry., 194 Mass. 179, 180 (1907). Everson v. Casualty Co. of America, 208 Mass. 214 (1911). See Ux v. North Reading, 379 Mass. 914, 915-916 (1979). Compare McLaughlin v. Cunningham, 13 Mass. App. Ct. 1086, 1087 (1982). However, “[i]t is for the excepting party to show that he has been prejudiced by the admission of the evidence.” Freedman v. Lipman, 223 Mass. 471, 472…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Zezuski v. Jenny Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Luz v. Stop & Shop, Inc. of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Everson v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fall River Savings Bank v. CallahanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- The Woodward School for Girls, Inc. v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Madden v. Malmart Mortgage Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- O'Sullivan v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Great America Leasing Corp. v. Law Office of JacksonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.