Legal Opinion
Edelman v. Page
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 2010No. AC 30547PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Steven Edelman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against certain defendants (state defendants) 1 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Although the plaintiff raised a number of claims in his appeal, 2 the pivotal issue is whether the court improperly granted the state defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction due to insufficient service of process. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts underlie the present litigation. “While driving by the [plaintiffs] house, Donald Schultz, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Denison v. CraftsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Breed Logistics, Inc. v. Ct Indy Nh Tt, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Stark v. TryonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Traylor v. GerratanaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Johnson v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Sosa v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.