Legal Opinion

McCook v. Council

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1947No. 15796Published

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. “When land is conveyed by metes and bounds, whether there be more or less than the quantity named in the deed,'the purchaser obtains the whole of it.” Benton v. Horsley, 71 Ga. 619 (3) ; McElroy v. McElroy, 142 Ga. 38 (4) (82 S. E. 442) ; May v. Sorrell, 153 Ga. 53 (111 S. E. 810). Objections based on the contention that such deeds convey more than the number of acres stated therein are without merit.

2. Findings of fact by an examiner, unexcepted to, which show that the objector could not have any interest in the land sought to be registered, become binding on the parties to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Benton v. HorsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. McElroy v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Asbury v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API