Atkinson v. City of Pierre
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this mandamus action on alleged nuisance and zoning ordinance violations, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment denying relief.
Background
[¶ 2.] Defendant Tour Ice began its retail business in 1978. Consisting of a mobile home and garage, it was first located at 420 South Henry Street, Pierre, South Dakota, one block west of its current site at 425 South Central Avenue. The business moved to the latter address in 1991, when its new icé plant was completed. Since its inception, it has operated for thirty-two years in a zone classified as the central business…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Armour and Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Knudson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Ehlebracht v. Deuel Cnty. Pln. Comm'n and Crowned Ridge Wind II, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Ehlebracht v. Crowned Ridge Wind II, LLC and S.D. Pub. Util. Comm'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.