Legal Opinion

Herring v. Blue Mound Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,520PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages for conversion. It was tried to the court, nominal damages only were allowed, and plaintiffs have appealed. Plaintiffs were the owners of an Ingersoll steam air compressor, being a part of and designed to be used in a mill for milling lead and zinc ore. Plaintiffs had taken this compressor onto premises which they had leased with the intention of erecting a mill in which it would be used. The mill was not erected, and the compressor stood on the lease for some months. Defendant had a mill a few miles away in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shepard v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Brown v. James H. Campbell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Laam v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Peru-Van Zandt Implement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Simpson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horn v. KlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Hawkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. of California v. MorrowArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Liggett v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API