Legal Opinion

Pacific Finance Corp. of California v. Morrow

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1953No. 5610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Pacific Finance Corporation of California, on June 2, 1949 brought an action in replevin against defendant-appellee S. O. Morrow, to recover possession of an automobile, title to which was retained by it under conditional sales contract. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

Two days later, pursuant to the writ of replevin plaintiff obtained possession of said automobile (minus the motor), and on January 20, 1950, it conducted a sale thereof at which defendant’s high bid of $150 was accepted. The car, still lacking the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. HarlanArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Herring v. Blue Mound Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. New York Central Railroad v. Buckley Rubber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bean v. GorbyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. City of Tucson v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API