Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from Morris District Court. Trover, brought by C. H. Pratt and D. A. Painter, to recover for the taking and conversion of cattle. All'the necessary facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiffs had judgment, at the October Term 1874, for $3,998.81, and costs, and Shepard brings the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The defendants in error brought their action against plaintiff in error to recover the value of certain cattle claimed to belong to them, and to have been converted by him to his own use. That the cattle at one time belonged to them, and that Shepard did get possession of and convert them, are undisputed facts. It appears that they made an arrangement with one Joseph "Wheat to take the cattle and winter them. While so in possession, Wheat transferred them to Shepard. Shepard claims that Wheat was a partner of theirs, with perfect legal right…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loomis v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  2. Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Burckle v. EckartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  5. Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Shoemake v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Shoemaker v. SonjuNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Grannell v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Kendrick v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API