Legal Opinion
Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 31, 2010No. CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek class certification on state law wage and hour claims. On August 13, 2010, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ federal Fair Labor Standards Act claims, pursuant to the first-to-file rule and a case proceeding in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Dkt. No. 70). Because that order disposed of all federal claims and the complaint only asserted supplemental jurisdiction as a basis for jurisdiction over state law claims, the court ordered supplemental briefing regarding subject matter jurisdiction.
For the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Jack Jimenez v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- In re Bank of America Wage & Hour Employment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Norris-Wilson v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.