Legal Opinion
Jack Jimenez v. Allstate Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 2014No. 12-56112PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Allstate appeals from the district court’s grant of class certification to Jack Jimenez and about 800 other Allstate employees in California who allege that Allstate has a practice or unofficial policy of requiring its claims adjusters to work unpaid off-the-clock overtime in violation of California law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(e), and we affirm.
I
Allstate has 13 local offices in California, which are individually managed -but under centralized leadership. 1 At those 13 offices, Allstate employs five categories of claims adjusters: Auto,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Civil Rights Education & Enforcement Center v. Hospitality Properties TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Bacilio Ruiz Torres v. Mercer Canyons Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Quinton Brown v. Nucor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Rafael Sandoval v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.