Legal Opinion

Fifield v. Bullwinkel

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1927No. Docket No. 4862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The action is brought by plaintiff against the executor of the last will and testament of Henry William Hedemann, deceased, to recover the amount of a claim on a debt owing by decedent to claimant, which was rejected and disallowed by the executor. The original complaint in the action was filed on the eighth day of September, 1923. The case came on for trial upon the issues presented by the amended complaint and the answer thereto. Upon the facts established by the evidence produced at that time, the court dismissed the action upon the ground that the action was barred by the provisions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCann v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merrill v. FinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Berger v. O'HEARNCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Berger v. O'HEARNCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API