Legal Opinion

Berger v. O'HEARN

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1953No. S. F. 18539Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.2d 729 (1953)

WILLIAM BERGER, Appellant,

v.

MAURICE O'HEARN, as Administrator, etc., Respondent.

S. F. No. 18539.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 15, 1953.

William Berger, in pro. per., W. L. A. Calder and Abraham Glicksberg for Appellant.

Samuel L. Fendel, Sol Silverman, James A. Toner and William W. Coshow, for Respondent.

EDMONDS, J.

William Berger, assertedly a creditor of the estate of V. B. McMahan, brought this action after his claim had been rejected. The administrator's demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. The question presented for decision upon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Tynan v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Brandenburger v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API