Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. the Etna

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 9, 1943No. 8125PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The decree here appealed from allowed an employer to intervene in the admiralty suit which his employee had instituted against third persons for damages for personal injury and accorded to the employer a right of subrogation, in respect of the employee’s recovery, to the extent of the compensation and medical expenses theretofore paid by the employer in accordance with the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act 1 because of the injury which was the subject-matter of the employee’s suit for damages. The relevant facts out of which the present controversy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Propeller Monticello v. MollisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Chapman v. HoageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Toomey v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Mason v. Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Universal Ins. v. Old Time Molasses Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fontana v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API