Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Hoage
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1936No. 151PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
This case comes here on certiorari to resolve a question arising under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of March 4, 1927, 44 Stat. 1424, made applicable to the District of Columbia by the Act of April 17, 1928, 45 Stat. 600.
Petitioner sought, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, a mandatory injunction directing respondent, a Deputy Commissioner of the District of Columbia Compensation District, to award him compensation. In the proceedings in that court it appeared that petitioner had been injured in a collision with a street car, in the course of his…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. the EtnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- Gibbs v. Hawaiian Eugenia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- McClelland v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.