Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1985No. 49222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.

On February 25, 1980, movant entered pleas of guilty on, and was convicted of, *829three counts of rape, one count of sodomy, and three counts of burglary. In 1984, he filed a Rule 27.26 motion, alleging his guilty pleas were rendered involuntary by ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, movant alleged counsel failed to investigate the circumstances surrounding movant’s confession, threatened movant with a sentence of 100 years if he went to trial, and did not desire to try the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oerly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Shelley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Cathy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Simons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Gooden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Frazier v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. LawrenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API