Legal Opinion

Ragan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1980No. KCD 30526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from denial of post-conviction relief sought by a motion to vacate conviction and sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26. The judgment is affirmed.

This proceeding predated the rule in Fields v. State, 572 S.W.2d 477 (Mo.banc 1978), but nonetheless, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing, with movant having counsel, and findings of facts and conclusions of law were entered in the court’s memorandum decision.

Review of this cause is limited by Rule 27.26(j), which provides that appellate review shall be limited to a determination of *736whether the findings,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Roy C. Reynolds v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Duane A. Verdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Barylski v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cathy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kimball v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kyles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API