Federated Logistics & Operations v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentKaren Lecraft Henderson, Circuit Judge
I join my colleagues in the majority except in two crucial respects. Because our role in reviewing the orders of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) requires u's to do more' than simply sign off on its unfair labor practice findings, see, e.g., Crowley Marine Sens., Inc. v. NLRB, 234 F.3d 1295, 1303 (D.C.Cir.2000) (“[O]ur review is not ‘ “a mere rubber stamp substituting judicial abdication for judicial review.” ’ ” (quoting Gen. Elec. Co. v. NLRB, 916 F.2d 1163, 1168 (7th Cir.1990) (quoting NLRB v. Hanstone Mfg. Co., 785 F.2d 570, 574-75 (7th Cir.1986)))) (Henderson, J., dissenting),…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.