State v. Benters
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
A motion to suppress evidence should be granted where the information presented in the search warrant has not been independently verified or corroborated by the requesting officer. Where a trial court makes competent findings of fact and conclusions of law in granting a motion to suppress evidence, we will not disturb those findings on appeal.
On 29 September 2011, Detective Justin Hastings, a narcotics detective with the Franklin County Sheriffs Office, contacted Lieutenant Joseph Ferguson of the Vance County Sheriffs Office regarding a drug investigation that began in Franklin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. McPhaulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014