Legal Opinion

State v. Benters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2013No. COA13-305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

A motion to suppress evidence should be granted where the information presented in the search warrant has not been independently verified or corroborated by the requesting officer. Where a trial court makes competent findings of fact and conclusions of law in granting a motion to suppress evidence, we will not disturb those findings on appeal.

On 29 September 2011, Detective Justin Hastings, a narcotics detective with the Franklin County Sheriffs Office, contacted Lieutenant Joseph Ferguson of the Vance County Sheriffs Office regarding a drug investigation that began in Franklin…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. McPhaulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. BentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API