Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1974No. 78PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The Court of Appeals correctly decided that the trial judge properly considered a photostatic copy of the original search warrant for the purpose of passing upon the validity of the original.- The State’s evidence disclosed that the original search warrant was lost, and in our opinion the introduction of the photostatic copy of the original provided plenary evidence both of the contents of the original and of regularity on its face. See State v. Cobb, 250 N.C. 234, 108 S.E. 2d 237; State v, McMilliam, 243 N.C. 771, 92 S.E. 2d 202.

Defendant’s argument that the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. McZornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API