Stern Company v. Paul
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The plaintiff corporation thought this action of replevin to recover possession of a diamond ring, delivered by it to Ben and Etta Paul, two of the defendants, under the terms of a certain written agreement, and pledged by them to the other defendants, trading as Rettew’s Money Loan Office. The owners of the money loan office filed a separate affidavit of defense averring, inter alia, that the writing under which the plaintiff delivered the ring to the Pauls is an agreement for a conditional sale of it to them, thereby bringing the transaction within the provisions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Miller Piano Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Schmidt v. BaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Hoeveler-Stutz Co. v. Cleveland Motor SalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Franklin Mortgage & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kindig v. Wertz, Admx.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.