Legal Opinion

S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Franklin Mortgage & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1931No. Appeal, 198PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of replevin brought by S. F. Bowser & Company, Inc., to recover from defendant possession of gasoline pumps and accessory equipment installed in a building erected and owned by the latter, and leased by it to the United States Post Office Department, for a garage. Defendant gave a counterbond and retained the articles. The case proceeded to trial and plaintiff recovered a verdict for $4,446, upon which judgment was entered, from which defendant appeals.

S. F. Bowser & Company manufactured and installed the appliances in question. Alexander Laub…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Brunswick & Balke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Hoeveler-Stutz Co. v. Cleveland Motor SalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Kelly Springfield Road Roller Co. v. SpykerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Kelter v. American Bankers Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Provident Trust Co. v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Valincenti v. Central Motors Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API