Legal Opinion

Kindig v. Wertz, Admx.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1934No. Appeal 455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Jacob Kindig, whose executors have since been substituted in the record, instituted an action of replevin against Blanch Wertz, administratrix of Jacob S. Warner, deceased, to recover possession of three black mules, which plaintiff alleged had been leased on April 27,1932 under the following written agreement, to wit:

“$400 York, Pa., April 27th, 1932.

I, for a valuable consideration, hereby agree to have this day leased and rented from Joe Kindig, a certain three (3) black mules 6 years old at and for the sum of twenty-five (25) dollars per month for sixteen (16) months,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StranghellanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Jones v. WandsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Enlow v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  4. Stern Company v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Clough v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. MinonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. In re Kamens Quality Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API