Legal Opinion
Baker v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1863PublishedCited by 8 opinions
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COUET OF EAMSEY COUNTY.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Flandeau, J.
The facts, as we collect them from the record, are as follows : On the 28th day of February, 1849, certain lands, embracing the piece in dispute, belonged in fee to Louis Roberts and Henry H. Sibley. On *492that day said Roberts and Sibley, together with others, made a plat of said lands, calling the same the “ City of St. Paul,’ > and filed the same with the Register of Deeds of the county in which the lands were situated. Upon this plat was Sibley street, which was sixty feet wide, and extended from the Mississippi river north, beyond Fifth street. This plat was made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Denning v. RoomeNew York Supreme Court · 1831
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burroughs v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Wilder v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Brisbine v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Bridges v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- City of Winona v. HuffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.