Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Ohio State University Hospital

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 8, 1998No. C2-97-189PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Mary Ann Thomson brings this action against defendants The Ohio State University Hospital and The Ohio State University under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. The matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendants to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).

I

There are generally two varieties of motions challenging subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1). The first possibility, that defendants interpose a facial attack on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Kilvitis v. County of LuzerneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. McGregor v. GoordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  5. Driesse v. Florida Board of RegentsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API