Legal Opinion
R. H. Berg v. Charles E. Hoppe, Assignee of Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1965No. 19317_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from a district court order entitled “Order Regarding Order to Show Cause and Certification of Respondents to this Court for Contempt.” This order issued as a result of appellants’ refusal to comply with a directive to file schedules and statements of affairs in advance of the trial of an involuntary Bankruptcy petition brought against appellants by certain of the present appellees. The jurisdiction of the district court was based upon 11 U.S.C. § 11. We have the authority to review that court’s order pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 47, sub. a.
On April 22,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Niagara Duplicator Co. v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- In re Robt. T. Cochran & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henrietta M. Faucher, Etc. v. Dolores Knoll Lopez, Louise M. Giovannoni, and Joseph E. HazelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Joslin Dry Goods Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1971
- R. H. Berg v. Charles E. Hoppe, Assignee of Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965