Legal Opinion
Henrietta M. Faucher, Etc. v. Dolores Knoll Lopez, Louise M. Giovannoni, and Joseph E. Hazel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1969No. 22096_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court following a directed verdict in a jury trial, adjudicating appellant to be a bankrupt. Joseph E. Hazel and others, petitioning creditors, 1 filed an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against the appellant on May 14, 1963. She answered denying, among other things, that she was insolvent at the time the alleged acts of bankruptcy occurred, and demanded a jury trial on the issue. She was ordered by the referee, pursuant to Sec. 3(d) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 21(d) to appear before him with her books,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- McGraw Company v. Central Transformer Corporation, Central Transformier Corporation v. McGraw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Coyner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Bogen & Trummel v. ProtterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Moore v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Theodore Chester Kulas v. Jaime FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Province v. Center for Women's Health & Family BirthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Helminski v. Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Helminski v. Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Windsor Communications Group, Inc. v. GrantDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.