Legal Opinion
Gattegno v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 30, 2001No. 3:00CV1399 (JCH)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL MENTAL EXAMINATION
FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendant’s Motion to Compel Mental Examination [Doc. # 15]. The defendant argues that a mental examination is warranted because the plaintiff alleges ongoing mental injury as a component of damages on her age and gender discrimination and retaliation claims, and because she asserts an independent cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff opposes the motion on the grounds that she asserts only “garden-variety” emotional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Lowe v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greenhorn v. Marriott Intern., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Bowen v. Parking Authority of the City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Smith v. KoplanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Grief Bros.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.