Legal Opinion

Koeneke v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1968No. Civ. 68-248PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The Defendants have filed a Motion to Transfer the above case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California at Los Angeles. In support of this Motion, the Defendants assert that the accident 1 and resulting injuries involved in this litigation occurred in Los Angeles, California; the Defendants will use over 20 witnesses all of whom live in California and are not subject to the subpoena power of this Court; the only witness to the accident in Oklahoma is the Plaintiff herself and her only other witness in Oklahoma is her family…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Lee You Fee v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Faucette v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clay v. Overseas Carriers Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Roc, Inc. v. Progress Drillers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. UOP, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  4. McGraw-Edison Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. Farrell Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API