Legal Opinion

United States v. Hood

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 30, 1993No. ACMR 9201347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GONZALES, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1988 and Supp.V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three months, and forfeiture of $523.00 pay per month for three months.

The appellant asserts that his court-martial lacked jurisdiction because it was composed of officer and enlisted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BrookinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. LanierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. DanielsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API