Legal Opinion
Waxman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 24, 1953No. Nos. 48766 and 48859PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HowellHowell, Judge
The cause of action before the court for determination is common to three separate suits which were accordingly consolidated for trial.1 Plaintiffs have brought their actions *468under tbe War Contract Hardship Claims Act,2 also known as the Lucas Act, for an equitable determination praying for relief from alleged losses suffered in the performance of contracts entered into by Acme with the United States. The Contracts were entered into and performed, and the alleged losses sustained, between September 16, 1940 and August 14,1945. Defendant has raised a number of contentions in support of…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Sticka v. Mellon Bank (DE) Natl. Assoc. (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- In Re MedinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Phillips Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.