Legal Opinion

Moser Manufacturing Co. v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1949No. Appeals, 256 to 260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These five suits which were consolidated for trial raise the question of whether a $30,000 fire insurance policy issued by United Mutual Underwriters to Moser Manufacturing Company, plaintiff, was in effect on October 19, 1944, when plaintiff’s plant was partly destroyed by fire. The policy provided that each of the five defendant insurance companies was subject to 20% liability thereunder. After these suits were instituted, the parties stipulated that if the policy was in force, each defendant was obligated to pay the sum of $4,744.36. The jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ludwinska v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Scott v. Sun Fire Office, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1890
  4. La France Workshop Lampshade Co. v. Buffalo InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Pennsburg Manufacturing Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Federation of Teachers v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Scott v. Southwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Smiler v. TollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Coppola v. Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Harty v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API