Legal Opinion
Margaret Rudin v. Carolyn Myles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2014No. 12-15362PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) establishes a one-year period of limitation within which an individual seeking relief must file an application for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Once that one-year period begins to run, it may be tolled only in certain circumstances. See id. § 2244(d)(2) (providing for statutory tolling); Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 2554, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010) (providing for equitable tolling). The question this case presents is whether Petitioner Margaret Rudin is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- George Gibbs v. Robert LegrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Rudin v. MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Custer v. Marquez-EspinoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Margaret Rudin v. Carolyn MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Patterson v. GentryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.