Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Gentry

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 26, 2020No. 2:17-cv-02131Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 MICHAEL PATTERSON, Case No. 2:17-cv-02131-JCM-EJY 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 JO GENTRY, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Before the court are the second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 19 19), respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27), the opposition of petitioner, Michael Patterson 20 (ECF No. 34), and respondents' reply (ECF No. 41). The court finds that the petition is untimely, 21 and the court dismisses the action. 22 II. Legal Standard 23 Congress has limited the time in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API