Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1934No. 25134. Department TwoPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of lots 24 and 25, of Edgewater Addition to the city of Seattle. February 18, 1932, she filed a claim against the city for three thousand dollars, charging that, during the preceding six months, officers and agents of the city had damaged the lots in that amount by the removal of three thousand cubic yards of gravel. The claim not being allowed, this action was brought.

The complaint set up two causes of action. The first was for three thousand dollars, the alleged value of the gravel taken; the second was for five thousand dollars, the alleged damage to the lots…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API