Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mizener

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. Testimony at the hearing established that claimant had an ownership interest in a business that sold western-style clothing and horse tack. He was also a signatory on the business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of RuqusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of DrevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of De VaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API