In re the Claim of Mizener
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. Testimony at the hearing established that claimant had an ownership interest in a business that sold western-style clothing and horse tack. He was also a signatory on the business…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of RuqusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of DrevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of De VaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997