Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Ruqus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

As a result of claimant’s affiliation with a business owned and operated by his wife, the Board found claimant ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The Board further charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of benefits and reduced his right to receive future benefits on the basis that he willfully made false…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MonroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of MizenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API