Malsch v. Waggoner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered March 3, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to enjoin a trespass upon real property.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
The following plat of the southeast quarter of section 13, township 29, north, of range 43, east, W. M., in *471Spokane county, will be of material assistance in understanding the issues involved in this action.
Tract A, consisting of forty acres, is the northeast quarter of said southeast quarter of section 13, and tract B is the north thirty acres of the northwest quarter of said southeast quarter of section 13. These two tracts, alleged to be the property of the plaintiffs, William Malsch and Katie Malsch, his wife, will hereinafter be designated as the north lands. Tract C is the south ten…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Schulenbarger v. JohnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Roe v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Robert Boyd Et Al., Appellants, v. Sunflower Properties LLC, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.