Legal Opinion

U.S. Bancorp v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2004No. OTC 4531; SC S51013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

This dispute concerns the Oregon corporate excise tax liability of U.S. Bancorp (taxpayer) for tax years 1988 through 1992. The primary question before us is whether, during the tax years at issue, the Department of Revenue (department) had authority to require taxpayer to depart from the rule prescribing the standard apportionment formula for financial organizations governed under ORS 314.280, 2 because that formula failed to provide an accurate reflection of taxpayer’s net income from business done within Oregon.

The department assessed additional taxes against taxpayer for tax years 1988…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Wilsonville Heights Assoc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hillenga v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. May Trucking Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Hessel v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API